The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll.
↧
SDT: Shirley Lewald
↧
SRA intervention
The latest intervention made by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
↧
↧
SDT: Christopher James Cook and Ian James Douglas
The SDT ordered that the first respondent (admitted 1978) and the second respondent (admitted 1991) should each pay a fine of £7,500.
↧
SDT: Simon James Murphy
The SDT ordered that the respondent should pay a fine of £2,500.
↧
SRA intervention
Recent intervention made by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
↧
↧
SDT: Russell James Rollings
The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll.
↧
SDT: Kamran Malik
The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll.
↧
SRA interventions
The latest interventions made by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
↧
SDT: Rukhsana Jabeen Kiani
The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll.
↧
↧
SRA interventions
The latest interventions made by the regulator.
↧
SDT: Louis Stanley Spragg
The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll.
↧
SDT: Michael George Anderson
The SDT ordered that the respondent should be suspended from practice as a solicitor for 18 months to commence on 30 September 2014.
↧
SDT: Boma Ellis-Dokubo, Karibo Lawson
The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal ordered that the first respondent should be struck off the roll; and that the second respondent should be suspended from practice as a solicitor for two years to commence on 3 September 2014.
↧
↧
SDT: Jean Harkin and Rachel Lloyd
The SDT ordered that the first and second respondents (both admitted 1999) should each pay a fine of £5,000.
↧
SRA intervention
The latest interventions made by the regulator.
↧
SDT: Zia Lat
The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll.
↧
SDT: Andersons Solicitors, Robert Alan Ainsworth, Christopher James Anderson, Peter Howard Coe, Margaret Ann Hunter and Paul Wade Richardson
After a rehearing on quantum of penalty and costs following an order of the High Court, the SDT ordered that the second respondent should pay a fine of £5,000; that the third respondent should pay a fine of £15,000; that the fourth respondent should pay a fine of £5,000; that the fifth respondent should pay a fine of £5,000; and that the sixth respondent should pay a fine of £5,000.
↧
↧
SDT: Mark John Linfield
The SDT ordered that the respondent should be suspended from practice as a solicitor for an indefinite period to commence on 21 October 2014.
↧
SDT: Lucia Shingirai Benyu and Ronnie Benyu
The SDT ordered that the first respondent (admitted 2002) should be struck off the roll.
↧
SDT: Ashley William Howard Barnes
The SDT ordered the respondent to pay a fine of £1,000.
↧