Quantcast
Channel: Law Gazette - Solicitor Disciplinary Tribunal & SRA interventions
Viewing all 600 articles
Browse latest View live

SDT: Shirley Lewald

$
0
0
The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll.

SRA intervention

$
0
0
The latest intervention made by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

SDT: Christopher James Cook and Ian James Douglas

$
0
0
The SDT ordered that the first respondent (admitted 1978) and the second respondent (admitted 1991) should each pay a fine of £7,500.

SDT: Simon James Murphy

$
0
0
The SDT ordered that the respondent should pay a fine of £2,500.

SRA intervention

$
0
0
Recent intervention made by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

SDT: Russell James Rollings

$
0
0
The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll.

SDT: Kamran Malik

$
0
0
The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll.

SRA interventions

$
0
0
The latest interventions made by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

SDT: Rukhsana Jabeen Kiani

$
0
0
The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll.

SRA interventions

$
0
0
The latest interventions made by the regulator.

SDT: Louis Stanley Spragg

$
0
0
The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll.

SDT: Michael George Anderson

$
0
0
The SDT ordered that the respondent should be suspended from practice as a solicitor for 18 months to commence on 30 September 2014. 

SDT: Boma Ellis-Dokubo, Karibo Lawson

$
0
0
The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal ordered that the first respondent should be struck off the roll; and that the second respondent should be suspended from practice as a solicitor for two years to commence on 3 September 2014.

SDT: Jean Harkin and Rachel Lloyd

$
0
0
The SDT ordered that the first and second respondents (both admitted 1999) should each pay a fine of £5,000.

SRA intervention

$
0
0
The latest interventions made by the regulator.

SDT: ​Zia Lat

$
0
0
The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll.

SDT: ​Andersons Solicitors, Robert Alan Ainsworth, Christopher James Anderson, Peter Howard Coe, Margaret Ann Hunter and Paul Wade Richardson

$
0
0
After a rehearing on quantum of penalty and costs following an order of the High Court, the SDT ordered that the second respondent should pay a fine of £5,000; that the third respondent should pay a fine of £15,000; that the fourth respondent should pay a fine of £5,000; that the fifth respondent should pay a fine of £5,000; and that the sixth respondent should pay a fine of £5,000.

SDT: Mark John Linfield

$
0
0
The SDT ordered that the respondent should be suspended from practice as a solicitor for an indefinite period to commence on 21 October 2014.

SDT: Lucia Shingirai Benyu and Ronnie Benyu

$
0
0
 The SDT ordered that the first respondent (admitted 2002) should be struck off the roll.

SDT: Ashley William Howard Barnes

$
0
0
The SDT ordered the respondent to pay a fine of £1,000.
Viewing all 600 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>